Skip to main content

My hot take on optional challenges is cooling off

When I design learning experiences in a corporate setting, I'm doing so with certain expectations in mind. The foremost one being that if I build it, I expect participation. This represents a fixed mindset. Every aspect of my lesson needs to be experienced, otherwise the learner won't succeed. Optional content often feels like wasted effort, or at the very least, something that won't yield consistent results. But this course (and the articles I've read along the way) challenge that mindset.

Dennen et al. (2024) examined a system of optional embedded microlearning challenges (OEMCs) designed to promote self-directed learning. The findings showed that the learners who opted in reported high levels of enjoyment and perceived value. What stood out to me was that these low-stakes, optional activities encouraged deeper engagement despite not being mandatory. In fact, learners engaged in these optional challenges because they wanted to! The rewards weren't mind-blowing (a digital badge or a token), but allowing the learner an amount of autonomy to engage in a relevant activity sparked motivation. This threw a bucket of cold water on my hot take that optional challenges were a waste of ID time.

My takeaway is that everything doesn't need to be graded or mandatory to be meaningful, and that deep learning experiences don't need to be forced onto the target audience. Optional challenges can foster curiosity and leave space for learners to engage in ways that resonate with them. In a workplace setting, this might translate to bite-sized, "Did you know..." learning prompts that tie into real job tasks. The challenge for me, aside from moving beyond my preconceptions, is ensuring that whatever challenges are relevant, engaging, and have some level of quantifiable ROI.

Comments

  1. Content CreatorJune 7, 2025 at 5:45 PM

    Quantifiable ROI...you nailed that one. How do you convince a client to increase billable hours to allow for investigations of optional educational routes. In a top down change model, this would be a tough sell. However, in a bottom up change model in which the power and ideas rest in the bottom levels this would be POWER in a bottle. When integrated with badged extrinsic incentives, you now have LIGHTNING in a bottle

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The (digital native) struggle is real

Digital Natives, a term to describe those of us who grew up with technology, are no strangers to change. We’ve seen enough major tech shifts that nothing really surprises us anymore. We went from flip phones to smartphones, ran tech support for our parents, built lives on social media, use AI to plan our finances, and swipe in cardinal directions just to find a date. Another day, another breakthrough. Because of this constant exposure to change, we’ve become wired for dynamic environments. And that’s why conventional education, with its static delivery and rigid structure, isn't going to cut it anymore. The world has moved on from static delivery and rigid learning environments. Lectures and textbooks feel outdated to a generation that just learned how to poach an egg from a 30-second TikTok. This shift creates both challenges and opportunities for instructional designers. Traditional models that rely on passive learning are a thing of the past. To stay relevant and effective, ins...
2 comments
Read more

1st post + a reflection on social media

This is my final term in the ISLT program, which is why I’ve named this blog Adam’s Home Stretch . That said, the name might be a little misleading—this blog isn’t so much about wrapping up grad school as it is about reflecting on my relationship with social media, which, at this point in time, feels... complicated. There was a time when I was much more active online. My last blog documented my years teaching ESL in South Korea, from 2011 to 2014. Before that, I was a college student with a Facebook account—back when Facebook was still exclusive to college students. I loved posting, sharing photos, commenting, and connecting. It felt fun, fresh, and meaningful. Social media helped me stay in touch with friends and discover new communities. Looking back, those posts now serve as a time capsule of some of the most formative years of my life. These days, though, I rarely create anything on social media, which is ironic, considering I now work for a major social media company. Part of it...
2 comments
Read more

PLEs and Me

Reading about Personal Learning Environments (PLEs) made me realize I’d unknowingly built one while prepping to build my new gaming PC. I’m not a hardware expert by any stretch of the imagination. Rather, I'm just a long-time gaming nerd who owned a seven-year-old rig that was starting to show its age. What began with watching YouTube videos and browsing Reddit posts turned into a full-on learning process that mirrored the three-tier PLE framework described by Dabbagh and Kitsantas (2012). I unknowingly started at Tier 1: personal information management . I saved building guides and Reddit posts, and built a YouTube playlist filled with how-to videos about fan optimization, cable management, and motherboard features. All of my learning was unstructured and self-directed, with a focus on gathering anything and everything that I felt would be useful. Next was the second tier: social interaction and collaboration . I started engaging with Reddit communities, asking for feedback on my ...
2 comments
Read more