Skip to main content

Padlet uses

I did this exercise with Miro, where I did a bit of digging to see how people are using a specific tool in an educational context. Let's do it again with Padlet!

Digital Portfolios
Use Case: In a personal Padlet, the learners upload reflections and projects, creating a "collage" of what they learned over the term.

Icebreakers and Community Building
Use Case: Basic Day 1 stuff -- students upload a photo in response to a fun prompt, serving as a way to introduce themselves to the class.

Collaborative Brainstorming
Use Case: At the start of a new training/class, learners can contribute ideas or prior knowledge to a Padlet wall in response to a prompt. Something like, "What do you know about X?"

Asynchronous Discussions
Use Case: Students post reflections or questions after watching a video or reading. They reply to their peers and continue the discussion.

Reading Response Shelves
Use Case: In a Shelf layout, the instructor posts some readings and has the learners respond to each one with summaries or analyses.

Daily Knowledge Check
Use Case: At the end of a lesson, the learners can reply to a prompt about what they learned. Good for evaluating retention and synthesis.


This scratches the surface, but I know there are more applications out there! Feel free to leave a comment if you have any other ideas!

Comments

  1. AyaJune 28, 2025 at 9:03 PM

    I haven't used Padlet before, but it reminds me of Trello. I briefly used Trello a bit for collaborative work at my job. It's so neat to see so many ways to use a single application. It's a nice reminder that people typically only use about 10% of a tool's functionality. There are so many possibilities if you get creative with it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reddit's r/changemyview and what we can learn from it

In an era where online discourse often falls into echo chambers, r/ChangeMyView (CMV) offers a refreshing, if somewhat abrasive, alternative. This subreddit invites users to post strong opinions and encourages others to challenge them, ideally with respect, tact, and with the goal of growth. The result is a model of civil disagreement that promotes critical thinking and builds knowledge through dialogue. While traditional hive minds tend to promote consensus, CMV is designed for disagreement. It leverages collective intelligence to sharpen and refine ideas through disagreement as opposed to reinforcing shared beliefs. In this model, learning doesn't come from conformity. Instead, it is born from the collaborative process of questioning and rethinking. I believe that higher education can borrow from this structure to improve online and in-person classroom discussions, which sadly often fail to spark meaningful engagement. Rather than asking students to simply share opinions, educato...
2 comments
Read more

My hot take on optional challenges is cooling off

When I design learning experiences in a corporate setting, I'm doing so with certain expectations in mind. The foremost one being that if I build it, I expect participation. This represents a fixed mindset. Every aspect of my lesson needs to be experienced, otherwise the learner won't succeed. Optional content often feels like wasted effort, or at the very least, something that won't yield consistent results. But this course (and the articles I've read along the way) challenge that mindset. Dennen et al. (2024) examined a system of optional embedded microlearning challenges (OEMCs) designed to promote self-directed learning. The findings showed that the learners who opted in reported high levels of enjoyment and perceived value. What stood out to me was that these low-stakes, optional activities encouraged deeper engagement despite not being mandatory. In fact, learners engaged in these optional challenges because they wanted to! The rewards weren't mind-blowing (a...
1 comment
Read more

Going Global

Let's get preachy about our "global community" on the internet. We have the tools to connect with anyone in the world thanks to modern advances in tech. Things like instant translation, global social platforms, and communities built around shared interests have opened so many doors for us to engage across borders. Across oceans! But having the tools doesn’t mean we’re using them meaningfully. Despite the appearance of a borderless digital space, many of us stay within the same familiar circles that mirror our own language, culture, or region. Even when we engage on “global” platforms, our networks are often shaped by algorithms that prioritize what’s comfortable and familiar, so we mostly interact with people who think like us, live near us, or speak our language.  Now, this might not be true depending on how the algorithm has defined  you  personally. Folks who truly engage in a global community might, in turn, have their algorithm offer less localized suggestions. Eithe...
Post a Comment
Read more