Skip to main content

Clawing our way out of the Fake News Era

Media literacy has never been more important than it is right now. In a world where anyone with a phone can create a headline and call it truth, the ability to think critically about what we read, watch, and share is essential. The so-called “fake news” era has blurred the line between fact and opinion, making it dangerously easy to spread misinformation. Worse, it’s not just fringe conspiracy sites fueling the problem, but also major household-name media outlets that people assume are trustworthy simply because they’ve been around forever.

Take Fox News, for example. Their $787 million defamation settlement is proof that even legacy media have no qualms about lying to their audiences. And yet, many viewers still take their reporting at face value. That’s the scary part, in my opinion. People are so used to seeing these logos on their screens that they’ve stopped questioning what’s behind the headline. We scroll, we share, we move on. Rarely do we pause to ask: Who wrote this? Why was it written? What’s being left out? That pause, that moment of scrutiny, is exactly what media literacy teaches us to do.

This kind of education shouldn’t just be reserved for school-aged kids. Adults, perhaps now more than ever, need it too. I’ve watched people I care about fall deep into rabbit holes on Facebook, believing and resharing articles that are completely fabricated. I've had passionate discussions with these family members and pleaded with them to be inquisitive; Don't accept the facts as they are, and if something sounds even a little unbelievable, then look into it. And it makes me wonder: if they had just a little media literacy training, would they start to question more and share less? Would they be able to see through the noise? Media literacy won’t solve everything overnight, but it’s a necessary first step in helping us reclaim the truth. It’s how we begin the long, bloody, and vital journey out of the fake news era.

Comments

  1. nickinickelzJuly 20, 2025 at 6:55 PM

    Media literacy is essential, not just for students but for all of us navigating today’s information overload. That pause you mention by questioning sources, intentions, and omissions, is critical in preventing misinformation from taking root. I completely agree that without media literacy, even the most trusted platforms can mislead us, and we need better tools to think critically and push back.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reddit's r/changemyview and what we can learn from it

In an era where online discourse often falls into echo chambers, r/ChangeMyView (CMV) offers a refreshing, if somewhat abrasive, alternative. This subreddit invites users to post strong opinions and encourages others to challenge them, ideally with respect, tact, and with the goal of growth. The result is a model of civil disagreement that promotes critical thinking and builds knowledge through dialogue. While traditional hive minds tend to promote consensus, CMV is designed for disagreement. It leverages collective intelligence to sharpen and refine ideas through disagreement as opposed to reinforcing shared beliefs. In this model, learning doesn't come from conformity. Instead, it is born from the collaborative process of questioning and rethinking. I believe that higher education can borrow from this structure to improve online and in-person classroom discussions, which sadly often fail to spark meaningful engagement. Rather than asking students to simply share opinions, educato...
2 comments
Read more

My hot take on optional challenges is cooling off

When I design learning experiences in a corporate setting, I'm doing so with certain expectations in mind. The foremost one being that if I build it, I expect participation. This represents a fixed mindset. Every aspect of my lesson needs to be experienced, otherwise the learner won't succeed. Optional content often feels like wasted effort, or at the very least, something that won't yield consistent results. But this course (and the articles I've read along the way) challenge that mindset. Dennen et al. (2024) examined a system of optional embedded microlearning challenges (OEMCs) designed to promote self-directed learning. The findings showed that the learners who opted in reported high levels of enjoyment and perceived value. What stood out to me was that these low-stakes, optional activities encouraged deeper engagement despite not being mandatory. In fact, learners engaged in these optional challenges because they wanted to! The rewards weren't mind-blowing (a...
1 comment
Read more

The (digital native) struggle is real

Digital Natives, a term to describe those of us who grew up with technology, are no strangers to change. We’ve seen enough major tech shifts that nothing really surprises us anymore. We went from flip phones to smartphones, ran tech support for our parents, built lives on social media, use AI to plan our finances, and swipe in cardinal directions just to find a date. Another day, another breakthrough. Because of this constant exposure to change, we’ve become wired for dynamic environments. And that’s why conventional education, with its static delivery and rigid structure, isn't going to cut it anymore. The world has moved on from static delivery and rigid learning environments. Lectures and textbooks feel outdated to a generation that just learned how to poach an egg from a 30-second TikTok. This shift creates both challenges and opportunities for instructional designers. Traditional models that rely on passive learning are a thing of the past. To stay relevant and effective, ins...
2 comments
Read more