Skip to main content

Going Global

Let's get preachy about our "global community" on the internet. We have the tools to connect with anyone in the world thanks to modern advances in tech. Things like instant translation, global social platforms, and communities built around shared interests have opened so many doors for us to engage across borders. Across oceans! But having the tools doesn’t mean we’re using them meaningfully. Despite the appearance of a borderless digital space, many of us stay within the same familiar circles that mirror our own language, culture, or region.

Even when we engage on “global” platforms, our networks are often shaped by algorithms that prioritize what’s comfortable and familiar, so we mostly interact with people who think like us, live near us, or speak our language. Now, this might not be true depending on how the algorithm has defined you personally. Folks who truly engage in a global community might, in turn, have their algorithm offer less localized suggestions. Either way, I believe that the promise of international collaboration is real, but many of us lack the effort it takes to move beyond our digital backyard.

If we want to truly embrace a global community, it requires intentionality. That means stepping outside of our algorithmic comfort zones and listening to voices we don't usually hear. We can be global citizens, we should be global citizens, but we need to shift our mindset and put in the effort if we ever want to achieve a true global community. Or maybe it already exists and nobody told me. That is also a possibility. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reddit's r/changemyview and what we can learn from it

In an era where online discourse often falls into echo chambers, r/ChangeMyView (CMV) offers a refreshing, if somewhat abrasive, alternative. This subreddit invites users to post strong opinions and encourages others to challenge them, ideally with respect, tact, and with the goal of growth. The result is a model of civil disagreement that promotes critical thinking and builds knowledge through dialogue. While traditional hive minds tend to promote consensus, CMV is designed for disagreement. It leverages collective intelligence to sharpen and refine ideas through disagreement as opposed to reinforcing shared beliefs. In this model, learning doesn't come from conformity. Instead, it is born from the collaborative process of questioning and rethinking. I believe that higher education can borrow from this structure to improve online and in-person classroom discussions, which sadly often fail to spark meaningful engagement. Rather than asking students to simply share opinions, educato...
2 comments
Read more

My hot take on optional challenges is cooling off

When I design learning experiences in a corporate setting, I'm doing so with certain expectations in mind. The foremost one being that if I build it, I expect participation. This represents a fixed mindset. Every aspect of my lesson needs to be experienced, otherwise the learner won't succeed. Optional content often feels like wasted effort, or at the very least, something that won't yield consistent results. But this course (and the articles I've read along the way) challenge that mindset. Dennen et al. (2024) examined a system of optional embedded microlearning challenges (OEMCs) designed to promote self-directed learning. The findings showed that the learners who opted in reported high levels of enjoyment and perceived value. What stood out to me was that these low-stakes, optional activities encouraged deeper engagement despite not being mandatory. In fact, learners engaged in these optional challenges because they wanted to! The rewards weren't mind-blowing (a...
1 comment
Read more