Skip to main content

Crouching Tiger, Hidden Lurker

I wasn’t aware of this until recently, but it seems lurkers have somehow developed a bad reputation of late. These are the folks who read posts, watch videos, observe chats, or otherwise consume content without actively contributing to the communities they frequent. In some circles, this behavior is labeled as free-riding.

I don't see it like that.

To me, a lurker is simply a contributor-in-waiting. An individual who is reading, learning, and observing the community until they find a topic that really resonates with them. Something they can sink their teeth into. I think most people go through a lurking phase. Honestly, I can’t think of many times where someone joins a chat, subreddit, or online group and immediately starts firing off posts.

Lurking gives people a chance to get a lay of the land. It helps them observe the norms, understand the culture, and maybe even pick up the lingo that seasoned members use. This kind of quiet participation is valuable because it prepares them to engage more thoughtfully when they do participate, versus jumping in blindly and risking behavior that doesn’t align with the community’s values.

So, let’s give lurkers a chance. Many of them are just taking the first steps toward becoming active, meaningful contributors.

Comments

  1. Hi Adam!

    I am for sure a lurker, in almost every online forum I'm in. I never really comment on Tik Toks, make posts on Reddit, or interact much besides give the occasional like. I agree with you on how lurkers don't deserve their bad rep, but maybe that's because I am one! Maybe one day I'll become an active contributor, but for now, I feel good staying in the shadows. Great blog post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really wish the word didn't carry the negative connotation. Lurkers are a valued part of the online world. WIthout them we'd all just be shouting at each other.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed. I think that lurkers do more than people realize. Sure, they might not be posting but they're likely upvoting or liking which feeds the algorithm and keeps the converastions or posts in the limelight!

      Delete
  3. I really appreciate your perspective on lurking, framing it as “contributor-in-waiting.” I agree lurking unfairly gets labeled as passivity, freeloading, or even being creepy. You're absolutely right that lurking can be an important part of learning and social acclimation in any community, digital or otherwise. It reminds me of how students sometimes observe before speaking up in class discussions. I was one of those students, not because I was disengaged, but because I was processing, reflecting, and building confidence.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The (digital native) struggle is real

Digital Natives, a term to describe those of us who grew up with technology, are no strangers to change. We’ve seen enough major tech shifts that nothing really surprises us anymore. We went from flip phones to smartphones, ran tech support for our parents, built lives on social media, use AI to plan our finances, and swipe in cardinal directions just to find a date. Another day, another breakthrough. Because of this constant exposure to change, we’ve become wired for dynamic environments. And that’s why conventional education, with its static delivery and rigid structure, isn't going to cut it anymore. The world has moved on from static delivery and rigid learning environments. Lectures and textbooks feel outdated to a generation that just learned how to poach an egg from a 30-second TikTok. This shift creates both challenges and opportunities for instructional designers. Traditional models that rely on passive learning are a thing of the past. To stay relevant and effective, ins...

Reddit's r/changemyview and what we can learn from it

In an era where online discourse often falls into echo chambers, r/ChangeMyView (CMV) offers a refreshing, if somewhat abrasive, alternative. This subreddit invites users to post strong opinions and encourages others to challenge them, ideally with respect, tact, and with the goal of growth. The result is a model of civil disagreement that promotes critical thinking and builds knowledge through dialogue. While traditional hive minds tend to promote consensus, CMV is designed for disagreement. It leverages collective intelligence to sharpen and refine ideas through disagreement as opposed to reinforcing shared beliefs. In this model, learning doesn't come from conformity. Instead, it is born from the collaborative process of questioning and rethinking. I believe that higher education can borrow from this structure to improve online and in-person classroom discussions, which sadly often fail to spark meaningful engagement. Rather than asking students to simply share opinions, educato...

PLEs and Me

Reading about Personal Learning Environments (PLEs) made me realize I’d unknowingly built one while prepping to build my new gaming PC. I’m not a hardware expert by any stretch of the imagination. Rather, I'm just a long-time gaming nerd who owned a seven-year-old rig that was starting to show its age. What began with watching YouTube videos and browsing Reddit posts turned into a full-on learning process that mirrored the three-tier PLE framework described by Dabbagh and Kitsantas (2012). I unknowingly started at Tier 1: personal information management . I saved building guides and Reddit posts, and built a YouTube playlist filled with how-to videos about fan optimization, cable management, and motherboard features. All of my learning was unstructured and self-directed, with a focus on gathering anything and everything that I felt would be useful. Next was the second tier: social interaction and collaboration . I started engaging with Reddit communities, asking for feedback on my ...